課程資訊
課程名稱
質性研究專題研討
Seminar in LIS Qualitative Research 
開課學期
111-2 
授課對象
文學院  圖書資訊學研究所  
授課教師
林珊如 
課號
LIS8026 
課程識別碼
126 D1040 
班次
 
學分
3.0 
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期二6,7,8(13:20~16:20) 
上課地點
圖資研討三 
備註
總人數上限:8人 
 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
本課程尚未建立核心能力關連
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

本課程為圖書資訊學研究所三學分之選修課。本課程主要在有系統介紹質性研究之哲學,理論基礎及方法論,強調其在圖書資訊學研究中之應用。 

課程目標
學生將透過實例之閱讀與探討,了解並評鑑質性研究在圖書資訊學研究領域之重要性、可行性及其學術之貢獻。學生同時有機會透過此一課程,實際設計應用質性研究方法於圖書資訊學之研究議題,以培養具有評論及從事質性研究之識見與能力。 
課程要求
閱讀討論 書報評論 數位學習 研究實作 口頭報告 書面報告 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
備註: 16:10-17:10 
指定閱讀
【教科書及參考書目】

1. 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。五南。501.2 7526 <<教科書>>
2. 胡幼慧主編(2008)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例篇(第二版)。巨流。<<教科書>>
3. Patton, M. Q. (2008). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 質性研究與評鑑(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯;第三版)。石濤。<<教科書>>
4. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1997). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. 質性研究概論(徐宗國譯)。巨流。
5. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). 當代社會研究法:質化與量化取向(蘇文賢主譯;第二版)。學富文化。 
參考書目
【推薦閱讀書目】

Burnett, K. (2012). Qualitative research and the modern library. The Library Quarterly, 82(4) 517-518.
Chang, Shan-Ju L. (1995). Toward a Multidimensional Framework for Understanding Browsing. (Ph. D. Dissertation. Rutgers University) .
Fidel, R. (1993). Qualitative methods in information retrieval research. LISR, 15, 219-247.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1994). Chapter 6: Methodology for studying the constructive process of information seeking(pp.79-108). Seeking Meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Ablex.
McKechnie, Lynne. (1996). Opening the “Preschoolers’ Door to Learning”: An Ethnographic Study of the Use of Public Libraries by Preschool Girls. (Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Western Ontario). #Z718.1 M35z
Rosenbaum, Howard. (1996). Managers and Information in Organizations: Towards a structurational concept of the Information Use Environment of Managers. (Ph.D. Dissertation. Syracuse University). #ZA3075 R672
Sonnenwald, Diane H. (1993). Communication in Design. (Ph.D. Dissertation. Rutgers University).
鄭陸霖(2009)。產業研究的質化方法:反省與分享。

Qualitative Research
Cibangu, S. K. (2013). A memo of qualitative research for information science: Toward theory construction. Journal of Documentation, 69(2), 194-213.
Gibbs, Graham R. (2014). The nature of social research. (Youtube, 30’34”: https://youtu.be/pQ4RAHXtvS0) + Quality in Qualitative Research. (Youtube, 34m: https://youtu.be/F1YfaSmDQbw) + Overview of Qualitative Research Methods. (Youtube, 12m: https://youtu.be/IsAUNs-IoSQ)
Taylor, D. (n.d.).The literature review: A few tips on conducting it. https://advice.writing.utoronto.ca/types-of-writing/literature-review/
Sage publications: Qualitative Research Series. 台大資料庫

Ethnography
Carlsson, H., Hanell, F. & Lindh, K. (2013). Exploring multiple spaces and practices: a note on the use of ethnography in research in library and information studies. Information Research, 18(3) paper C17. http://InformationR.net/ir/18-3/colis/paperC17.html
Klare, D. & Hobbs, K. (2011) Digital ethnography: Library web page redesign among digital natives. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 23(2), 97-110.
Khoo, M., Rozaklis, L. & Hall, C.. (2012). A survey of the use of ethnographic methods in the study of libraries and library users. Library and Information Science Research, 34(2), 82-91.
葉乃靜老師線上課程 民族誌田野研究法:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMRDIQpynaI&t=256s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25OnJ47fl5E&list=PLFLZW1q15_aHB_Zcnark-0QiEG5-WAjWu&index=52
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEo6dO22vHo&list=PLFLZW1q15_aHB_Zcnark-0QiEG5-WAjWu&index=53
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6mYkB9k7MY&list=PLFLZW1q15_aHB_Zcnark-0QiEG5-WAjWu&index=54
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fm6a3-vPuVY&list=PLFLZW1q15_aHB_Zcnark-0QiEG5-WAjWu&index=55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zUlWtLeDZI&list=PLFLZW1q15_aHB_Zcnark-0QiEG5-WAjWu&index=56

Grounded theory
Tan, J. (2010). Grounded theory in practice: Issues and discussion for new qualitative researchers. Journal of Documentation, 66(1), 93-112.
González-Teruel, A., & Abad-García, Francisca M. (2012). Grounded theory for generating theory in the study of behavior. Library & Information Science Research,34 , 31-36.
Mansourian, Y. (2006). Adoption of grounded theory in LIS research. New Library World, 107(9), 386-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074800610702589

Phenomenology
Budd, J. M. (2005). Phenomenology and information studies. Journal of Documentation, 61(1), 44-59.
Budd, J. M., Hill, H., & Shannon, B. (2010). Inquiring into the real: A realist phenomenological approach. The Library Quarterly, 80(3), 267-284. http://search.proquest.com/docview/753822817?accountid=14229
Savolainen, R. (2007). Information source horizons and source preferences of environmental activists: A social phenomenological approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(12), 1709-1719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20644

Symbolic interactionism
Westbrook, L., & Finn, J. (2012). Community information as boundary object: Police responsibility for abuse survivors. Journal of Documentation, 68(6), 806-825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411211277055 [Symbolic Interaction]
Fidishun, D. (2002). Symbolic interactionism and library research: using a qualitative methodology to understand library interchange. Portal: Libraries and the Academy,2(3),443-453
Mansourian, Y. (2006). Adoption of grounded theory in LIS research. New Library World, 107(9), 386-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03074800610702589

Observation
*Pettigrew, K. E. (2000). Lay information provision in community settings: How community health nurses disseminate human services information to the elderly. The Library Quarterly, 70 (1), 47-85.
*Bedwell, L. & Banks, C. (2013). Seeing Through the Eyes of Students: Participant Observation in an Academic Library. Partnership: the Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 8(1), 1-17.
Cooper, J., Lewis, R. and Urquhart, C. (2004) "Using participant or non-participant observation to explain information behavior." Information Research, 9(4) , 184. http://InformationR.net/ir/9-4/paper184.html

VI. Examples: Qualitative Research in LIS Theses
1. Sonnenwald, Diane H. (1993). Communication in Design. (Ph.D. Dissertation. Rutgers University). 質化研究設計
2. Chang, Shanju L. (1995). Towards a conceptual framework for understanding browsing. (Ph.D. Dissertation. Rutgers University). 紮根理論分析法
3. Erdelez, Sanda. (1995). Information Encountering: An Exploration Beyond Information Seeking. (Ph.D. Dissertation. Syracuse University). 錄音記錄法
4. Rosenbaum, Howard. (1996). Managers and Information in Organizations: Towards a structurational concept of the Information Use Environment of Managers. (Ph.D. Dissertation. Syracuse University). 深度訪談法
5. McKechnie, Lynne. (1996). Opening the “Preschoolers’ Door to Learning”: An Ethnographic Study of the Use of Public Libraries by Preschool Girls. (Ph.D. Dissertation). 觀察法
6. 林珊如(2003)。本土化數位圖書館與博物館使用者研究:資訊需求、資訊搜尋與使用行為之探討。文華。相關章節:平埔研究。質化研究
7. 劉應琳(2001)。閱讀研究:台大BBS Books版愛書人休閒閱讀之探討[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所。線上民族誌
8. 許禎芸(2007)。提前退休教師日常生活資訊行為模式之探究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所。民族誌訪談
9. 林怡璇(2007)。從老年人獲取資訊與通訊科技(ICT)技能的歷程探討數位落差[未出版之碩士論文。國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所。民族誌田野研究
10. 李郁雅(2000)。博士論文研究歷程中情境與資訊行為之探索:以植物分類學為例[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所。日誌法、紮根理論
11. 洪元元(2007)。音樂聆賞歷程之研究[未出版之碩士論文]。多元方法(日誌+訪談+文件分析)

VII. On Reserves
Overview of Qualitative Research
1. 叢書:Qualitative Research Methods Series. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. 總圖2F人社資料區(經典書名清單詳最下面)
2. 鈕文英(2021)。研究方法與設計:量化、質性與混合方法取向(三版)。雙葉。系圖 501.2 8704-2 2021
3. 蕭瑞麟(2020)。不用數字的研究:質性研究的思辯脈絡。五南。
4. Creswell, John W.(2018)。質性研究的五種取徑(李政賢譯)。五南。
5. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.(2001)。質性硏究入門:紮根理論硏究方法(吳芝儀,廖梅花譯)。濤石。系圖指定參考501.28 5029 2001
6. 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。五南。
7. 胡幼慧主編(2008)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例篇(第二版)。巨流。540.1 7291 2008
8. 潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。心理。
潘淑滿(2022)。質性研究:理論與應用(第二版)。心理。[採購中]
9. Maxwell, J. A.(2001)。質化硏究設計:一種互動取向的方法。(高熏芳,林盈助,王向葵合譯)。心理。520.31 4062
10. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1997)。質性研究概論(徐宗國譯)。巨流。501.28 5029
11. Patton, M. Q. (2008). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 質性研究與評鑑(吳芝儀、李奉儒譯;第三版)。石濤。
12. Yin, Robert K.(2014)。質性研究:從開始到完成(李政賢譯)。五南。系圖 501.2 2724
Yin, Robert K.(2021)。質性研究:從開始到完成(李政賢譯;二版)。五南。[採購中]
13. Liamputtong, P. (2009). Qualitative Research Methods. Oxford University Press. H62 Q3545 2002
14. Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass. LB1028 M396 2009
Merriam, S.B.(2018)質性研究:設計與施作指南(邱炳坤等譯)。五南。 [總圖501.2 4011-1 2018]

Qualitative Research Methods
15. Creswell, John W(2015)。研究設計:質性、量化及混合方法取向。(林正昌主譯)。學富。501.2 4014 2015
16. Crabtree, B. F., Miller, W. L.(2007)。最新質性方法與研究。(黃惠雯等譯)。韋伯。410.31 4012 2003
17. Angrosino, M.(2010)。民族誌與觀察研究法(張可婷譯)。韋伯。536.031 3042
18. Carspecken, P. F.(2004)。教育研究的批判民俗誌:理論與實務指南(董維真等譯)。高教。520.31 2114
19. Kvale, S.(2010)。訪談研究法(陳育含譯)。韋伯。系圖指定參考
20. Kim, Jeong-Hee(2018)。理解敘說探究:以故事的雕琢與分析作為研究(張曉佩、卓秀足譯)。心理,民107。總圖3F指定參考書區 AC-3
21. Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., Zilber, T.(2007)。敘事研究:閱讀、分析與詮釋(吳芝儀譯)。濤石。811.1 4044
22. Clandinin, D. J., Connelly, F.(2003)。敘說探究:質性研究中的經驗與故事(蔡敏玲、余曉雯譯)心理。520.31 4043
23. Morse, J. M. & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed Method Design: Principles and Procedures. Left Coast Press. H62 M6611 2009

Writing up Qualitative Research
24. 鈕文英(2021)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。雙葉。501.2 8704 2017
25. 伍寇特(Wolcott, H. F.)(2011)。質性研究寫作(顧瑜君譯)。五南。011.1 2132 2011
26. 葉乃嘉(2008)。質性研究寫作的第一本書:質性與量化論述的文字經營準則。五南。811.4 4414-1
27. 馮朝霖、簡楚瑛主編(2001)。質性研究:理論與實作對話。五南。170.5 7291
28. DeMarrais, K. B.(主編)(2007)。透視質性硏究:18位硏究者的反思(李政賢譯)。五南。系圖501.2 491
29. Geertz, C.(1999)。文化的解釋。(韓莉譯)。譯林出版社。[總圖/社圖] 541.2 4018 1999
30. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books. GN315 G36
31. Giddens, A.(2002)。社會的構成(李康、李猛譯)。左岸。546 2714 2002
32. Mellon, C. A. (1990). Naturalistic Inquiry for Library Science: Methods and Applications for Research, Evaluation, and Teaching. Greenwood Press. Z669.7 M46 1990

Examples of Qualitative Research
33. 林珊如(2003)。本土化數位圖書館與博物館使用者研究:資訊需求、資訊搜尋與使用行為之探討。文華。023.6 4414-1
34. 劉雅齡(2020)。老年社區健康活動參與經驗之質性研究:以性別觀點切入[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣大學健康行為與社區科學研究所。(T) 417.7 7272
35. 張舜欽(2019)。安寧緩和醫師對於死亡準備的經驗與看法初探:質性研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣大學醫學教育暨生醫倫理研究所。(T) 410.1619 1128
36. 黃儷莉(2006)。人際和諧與衝突:本土化的理論與研究。桂冠。535.72 4464 2006
37. 張錦華(2001)。女為悅己者瘦?:瘦身廣告風潮、大眾媒介效果、與閱聽人詮釋。女書。497.1 1184
38. 徐宗國(1995)。工作內涵與性別角色。稻鄉,民84。544.53 2836 1990
39. The whole issue in JASIS, 53(14). Perspectives on …Effective methods for studying information seeking and use

其他參考書目:
40. Koch, P.(1997)。Solitude: A Philosophical Encounter. 孤獨:一個哲學的交會(梁永安譯)。立緒。191 2440 2001
41. 蔡詩萍(2001)。妳,這樣寂寞。時報,民90。848.7 4404-2
42. 蘇以文(2005)。隱喻與認知。台大出版中心。800.1 4420
43. 黃光國(2002)。科學哲學與創造力。立緒。501.1 4496
44. Christensen, C. M. & Raynor, M. E. (2004)。創新者的解答(李芳齡、李田樹譯)。天下雜誌。494 4064
45. Jim Collins(2003)。從A到A+:向上提升,或向下沉淪?企業從優秀到卓越的奧祕(齊若蘭譯)。遠流。494.2 4144 2003
46. 卡羅斯‧卡卡羅斯‧斯塔尼達(Castaneda, C.)(1998)。巫士唐望的教誨(魯宓譯)。張老師。536.51 2144-5 2010

Series of Sage (在指定參考書區架上:質性研究專題研討)
47. Adler, P. A. & Adle, P. (1987). Membership Roles in Field Research. Sage Publications. H62 A4235 1987
48. Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (eds) (1992). Doing Qualitative Research. Sage publication. R853.S64 D65 1992
49. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications. H62 C6963 2009
50. Fielding, N. G., & Fielding, J.L. (1986). Linking Data. Sage Publications. H62 F425 1986
51. Gubrium, J. F. (1988). Analyzing Field Reality. Sage Publications. HM24 G814 1988
52. Hamel, J., Dufour, S.& Fortin, D. (1993). Case Study Methods. Sage Publications. HN62 H231813 1993
53. Hill, M. R. (1993). Archival Strategies and Techniques. Sage Publications. H61.275 H55 1993
54. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J.F. (1995). The Active Interview. SAGE Publications. H61.28 H65 1995
55. Kirk, J.,& Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Sage publication. GN346.4 K57 1986
56. Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Sage Publications. Q180.55.M4 M39 2005
57. McCracken, G. D. (1988). The Long Interview. Sage Publications. H61.28 M37 1988
58. Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Publications. H61.28 M67 1997
59. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications. H62 P3218 2002
60. Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-interaction. Sage Publications. P95.45 P77 1995
61. Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative Analysis. Sage Publications. P302.7 R54 1993
62. Schwartzman, H. B. (1993). Ethnography in Organizations. Sage Publications. HD58.7 S349 1993
63. Wolcott, H. F. (2001). Writing up Qualitative Research(2nd). Sage Publications. T11 W65 2001 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
Topical Analysis of Qualitative Research in LIS 
5% 
 
2. 
Review of a Qualitative Research Study  
10% 
 
3. 
Field study – Participative Observation and Field Notes 
15% 
觀察記錄。 
4. 
Field study – Long interview 
10% 
訪談實作。 
5. 
Research Project 
60% 
Mid-point Progress Report (Oral): (10%) Final Presentation (Oral): (10%) Written Research Report: (40%)。 
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
02/21  [MODULE ONE: OVERVIEW]
Course Overview
什麼是質性研究?
質性研究的發展與分類 
第2週
02/28  National Holiday [no class]
(YT: Gibbs, 2014) 
第3週
03/07  Design of Qualitative Research
(Communication in Design / Sonnenwald) 
第4週
03/14  Group Discussion: Assignment 1&2
QR in LIS + selected review articles
 
第5週
03/21  [MODULE Two: DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS METHODS]
Fundamentals of Qualitative Research
(Seeking meaning / Kuhlthau) 
第6週
03/28  Participant Observation
(Opening the “Preschoolers’ Door to Learning / McKechnie)
(Pettigrew, 2000) (Bedwell & Banks, 2013)
(老人學習ICT科技 / 林怡璇) 
第7週
04/04  Holiday. No class. 
第8週
04/11  Group Discussion: Assignment 3 
第9週
04/18  Ethnographic Interview
(Information Use Environment (IUE) / Rosenbaum) 
第10週
04/25  Group Discussion: Assignment 4-1 
第11週
05/02  [MODULE Three: EMPIRICAL STUDIES]
Grounded Theory and Narrative Analysis
(博士研究歷程 / 李郁雅) 
第12週
05/09  Data Analysis: Using QR software
Lab ATLASti demo 
第13週
05/16  Group Discussion: Assignment 4-2 
第14週
05/23  [MODULE Four: Write up]
Principles and methods of writing up a Qualitative Study 
第15週
05/30  Final: Research Presentation 
第16週
06/06  Final: Research Presentation
Reflection and Evaluation with snacks